[Scribus] scribus xml versus xsl fo?

[Alexandre Prokoudine]

Peter Linnell wrote
> > 
> > Are there architectural reasons for Scribus to disregard FO?
> > (I notice that Passepartout also uses its own yet-another xml
> > vocabulary, and its own renderer.)
> 
> Yes. Very much so.

<skipped/>

Peter, what about FO->Scribus?

I'm highly interested in it, because we use docbook->passivetex for our
documentation at the moment. Creating XSL-FO is not a problem -- it is a
common task for xsltproc. So FO2Scribus would be quiet enough.

If anyone implements any tool to achieve this goal, I can provide as much
testing as needed.

-- 
Alexandre Prokoudine		| "When you set yourself on fire and aim 
ALT Linux Documentation Team	|  for the sky, you hope to leave behind 
E-mail: avp at altlinux.ru		|  some sparks of heat and light"
JabberID: avp at altlinux.org	|                             Neil Peart
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20031119/8ecbeccc/attachment.pgp