[Scribus] Documentation
Gregory Pittman
gpittman
Mon May 24 01:27:10 CEST 2004
Craig Bradney wrote:
>On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 17:26, Gregory Pittman wrote:
>
>
>>I think we can all understand the size of the job of updating the
>>documentation for Scribus. What I am wondering is why the documentation
>>isn't being done and made available in some kind of modular format,
>>especially considering the ever-changing nature of the CVS version.
>>
>>
>Well.. if theres no docs.. ask, or play and learn..
>
>Meanwhile.. we are in the process of rewriting those docs and creating a
>new website for them, to be released with 1.2. (as has been said before
>on the list! more than once!)
>
>Some features arent finished yet, or finished between developers
>releases.. why should we write user docs for an unfinished feature....
>
>Please..
>
>Craig
>
>
I'm asking, I'm playing, I'm learning, I'm playing...
<butmoreseriously>
My counterpoint would be two things,
1. If Scribus itself were released after it was 'done', it wouldn't be
out yet.
2. It's possible that in the process of writing about a feature, one can
realize, 'you know, that's not really the way it should be...'
</butmoreseriously>
I love this program!
Greg P
More information about the scribus
mailing list