[Scribus] this whole wiki thing

[Craig Bradney]

On Friday 04 February 2005 12:17, Thomas R. Koll wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:48:06AM +0100, Craig Bradney wrote:
> > On Friday 04 February 2005 11:24, Thomas R. Koll wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:30:09AM +0100, Craig Bradney wrote:
> > > > On Friday 04 February 2005 08:44, Thomas R. Koll wrote:
> > > > > Other question: Why a by-nc instead of by-sa? It will get a problem
> > > > > for publishers using parts of the docs.
> > > >
> > > > Exactly the idea.
> > >
> > > Then we should include parts of the wiki into the Scribus package.
> >
> > We already include Scribus documentation in the package.. which we intend
> > to be different to that on the wiki.
>
> Sorry, I meant:
> Then we should not include parts of the wiki into the Scribus package.
> The by-nc is considered incompatible by the Debian staff and we surely
> would get problems with that.
> And if we can't include the docs from the wiki, then the wiki makes less
> sense.

Its only Debian with its interesting ideas that does this. The Debian 1.2.1 
version of Scribus already does not include the documentation but there is a 
documentation package in the non-free packages of Debian. All the other 
distros are quite happy to package as we do.

Craig
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20050204/016b32ce/attachment.pgp