[scribus] New Linux User -- Scribus in place of Page Maker 6?
Tornóci László
torlasz at net.sote.hu
Fri Aug 8 19:06:02 CEST 2008
dlwiggers wrote:
> JLuc wrote:
>> Frank Swygert a écrit :
>>> How stable and functional is Scribus? Anyone here moved from PM to
>>> Scribus?
>>
>> From my perspective, Scribus is not usable :
>>
>> Stable version runs slow with midly large documents,
>> crashes more than wished, proposes a couple of buged basic features
>> and a cripled usablity.
>>
>> This being said, Scribus is very ok and powerfull for most basic works
>> (like a single page with text and images but not too many layers)
>> or for experts being pleased to slalom between bugs and external tools.
>>
>> Sorry,
>> JL
>>
>>
> I concur. Add unresponsive and sometimes snotty ml.
>
> Lee
Hi,
I think that instead of apparently biased generalizations, like the
above, have a look at the 'Scribus success stories' here:
http://wiki.scribus.net/index.php/Success_stories
You can see what people can actually create with scribus. That may give
you an idea what scribus can do.
As for the mailing list (guess that's what ml is), I couldn't disagree
any more. I've been a member of many technical mailing lists before, and
this is the most tolerant and helpful one that I've seen.
The only problem I see with scribus, compared with some other open
source projects like inkscape, that development seems a bit slow,
releases could be more frequent.
Yours: Laszlo
More information about the scribus
mailing list